II. Epidemiology
- U.S. Prevalence: 1.2 to 1.6% (up to 5 to 6% by computer modeling)
III. Definitions
- Barrett Esophagus
- Premalignant precursor to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
- Chronic Reflux Esophagitis leads to metaplastic columnar cells replacing the normal esophageal squamous epithelium
IV. Pathophysiology
- Metaplasia
- Columnar metaplasia of distal Esophagus (from normal squamous cell lining)
- Response to chronic inflammation from gastric acidic fluid via lower esophageal sphincter
- Precancerous lesion
- Metaplasia progresses to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in 0.24% to 0.33% of patients with Barrett Esophagus annually
- Overall Esophageal Adenocarcinoma is rare (1% of U.S. cancers)
V. Risk Factors
- Precautions
- Two or more positive risk factors significantly increase Barrett Esophagus risk
-
Gastroesophageal Reflux
-
GERD Symptoms
- Chronic GERD symptoms progresses to Barrett Esophagus in up to 10% of patients
- Reported symptoms > 3x/week for 20 years: RR = 40
- Self report weekly symptoms for prior year: OR = 29.7
-
GERD duration
- Persisted >10 years: Odds Ratio 6.4
- Persisted 5-10 years: Odds Ratio 5.0
- Persisted 1-5 years: Odds Ratio 3.0
- Increases risk of long-segment Barrett Esophagus
- Onset of GERD before age 30 years: Odds Ratio 15.1
- However, overall only a small percentage of those with GERD develop Barrett Esophagus
- Up to half of patients in some studies are asymptomatic of Barrett Esophagus
-
GERD Symptoms
- Caucasian (as opposed to asian, hispanic and black patients)
- Hiatal Hernia
- Family History of Barrett Esophagus
- Age over 40-50 years old
- Age >40 (OR=4.9)
- Risk is even greater at age > 50 years old
-
Tobacco Abuse
- Two fold increase in Esophageal Cancer with a 30 or 45 pack year history of Tobacco Abuse
- Odds Ratio 2.4 (former or current Tobacco Abuse)
- Odds Ratio 51.4 if patient with Tobacco Abuse self-reports weekly Acid Reflux symptoms
- Alcohol does not appear to increase Barrett Esophagus risk
- Male gender
- Odds Ratio 3.7
-
Obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2)
- Odds Ration 4.0 regardless of symptoms
- Odds Ratio 34.4 if obese patient self-reports weekly Acid Reflux symptoms
VI. Evaluation: Endoscopy
- Indications for screening for Barrett's Esophagus
- Significant risk factors above
- See GERD related indications as below
- Red flag symptoms
- Dysphagia
- Odynaphagia or obstruction
- Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding or Anemia
- Weight loss
- Symptoms refractory to Proton Pump Inhibitors
- Significant risk factors above
- Surveillance and management protocol (controversial)
- Guidelines are per American College of Gastroenterology, and correlate overall with other organizations
- American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
- American College of Physicians
- American Gastroenterological Association
- GERD
- GERD without risk factors does not require upper endoscopy
- Consider screening once in patients with chronic or frequent GERD with multiple risk factors
- Consider especially if GERD refractory to standard management (unless findings change)
- Avoid screening if Life Expectancy <10 years
- Men: Age >50 years and at least one other risk factor
- Women: Age >50 years and at least two or more other risk factors
- Barrett's Esophagus without dysplasia
- Repeat endoscopy with biopsy in one year
- If no dysplasia x2 biopsies, then endoscopy every 3-5 years
- If no significant comorbidities, may continue surveillance, until age 81 years in men age 75 years in women
- Avoid surveillance when Life Expectancy <5 years
- Low grade dysplasia
- Consider endoscopic treatment with ablation (NNT 10, see management below)
- Repeat endoscopy with biopsy in 6 months
- Then repeat upper endoscopy yearly until no dysplasia on 2 biopsies (and then endoscopy every 3 years)
- High grade dysplasia (or intramural carcinoma)
- Endoscopic treatment for dysplasia (see management below)
- Repeat upper endoscopy every 3 months for 1 year, then every 6 months for 1 year, then yearly
- Consider esophagectomy if able to undergo surgery
- Consider endoscopic resection and ablation if not able to undergo surgery
- References
- Guidelines are per American College of Gastroenterology, and correlate overall with other organizations
- Findings consistent with Barrett's Esophagus
- Z-line is squamocolumnar junction
- Z-Line is normally at gastroesophageal junction
- Barrett's Esophagus
- Normal pale-white esophageal mucosa appears salmon colored on endoscopy
- Esophageal biopsy demonstrates columnar epithelium with goblet cells (metaplasia)
- Z-line shifts up from gastroesophageal junction (at least 1 cm above gastric folds)
- Long-segment Barrett's: >3 cm from junction
- Short-segment Barrett's: <3 cm from junction
- Normal pale-white esophageal mucosa appears salmon colored on endoscopy
- Z-line is squamocolumnar junction
- Screening difficulties
- Endoscopy Complications (1 in 200 to 10,000)
- Esophageal Perforation or bleeding
- Cardiopulmonary events
- Adverse effects from sedation (e.g. Aspiration Pneumonitis)
- Esophageal Cancer is uncommon, even in Barrett Esophagus
- Most Esophageal Cancer patients have no GERD symptoms
- Surveillance results in earlier stage Esophageal Cancer diagnosis, but does not lower all cause mortality
- References
- Endoscopy Complications (1 in 200 to 10,000)
VII. Management
-
Proton Pump Inhibitor or PPI (e.g. Prilosec, Protonix) Long-term
- High dose (e.g. Esomeprazole 40 mg) may be preferred over low dose (e.g. Esomeprazole 20 mg)
- Antireflux Surgery is no better than PPI is prevention of Barrett Esophagus progression to adenocarcinoma
- High grade dysplasia
- Noninvasive methods (Endoscopic Treatment)
- Noninvasive treatment methods may also be considered in low grade dysplasia
- Photodynamic therapy
- Systemic Photosensitizers administered followed by endoscopic exposure to laser light
- Complete response in >78% of cases
- Only treatment that significantly reduces Barrett Esophagus progression to cancer
- Risk of Esophageal Stricture in 33%
- Radiofrequency Ablation
- Balloon placed adjacent to mucosal lesions and providers localized thermal ablation
- Complete response in >91% of cases
- Risk of Esophageal Stricture 6-8%, bleeding 1% and perforation 0.6%
- Endoscopic mucosal resection
- Complete response in >76% of cases
- Preferred method for endoscopic cancer staging of nodular lesions
- Also indicated in the treatment of T1a (mucosal invasion) Esophageal Adenocarcinoma lesions
- Risk of Esophageal Stricture in >50% (as well as bleeding and perforation)
- Invasive methods
- Esophagectomy
- Noninvasive methods (Endoscopic Treatment)
- Other measures
- Small decrease in Esophageal Cancer associated with those on Aspirin (or NSAID), or on a Statin
- Aspirin and Statin may be considered if indicated for other indication
- Jankowski (2018) Lancet 392(10145): 400-8 [PubMed]
- Thomas (2018) J Gastrointest Cancer 49(4): 442-54 [PubMed]
- Small decrease in Esophageal Cancer associated with those on Aspirin (or NSAID), or on a Statin
VIII. Prognosis: Endoscopy factors predicting low risk of adenocarcinoma
- Low grade or no dysplasia on initial endoscopy and
- Barrett's Esophagus length <6 cm
- Weston (2004) Am J Gastroenterol 99:1657-66 [PubMed]
IX. Complications: Barrett's Esophagus progression to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
- Metaplasia progresses to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in <0.5% of patients with Barrett Esophagus annually
- Most Barrett Esophagus patients (93%) die from causes other than Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
- Relative Risk of adenocarcinoma with Barrett Esophagus: 11.3
- Lifetime risk of requiring an intervention for high grade dysplasia or Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: 1 in 5 (or 6)
- Risk increases with longer segment Barrett Esophagus (1.1 RR/cm over 2 cm)
- Risk increases with dysplasia on biopsy
- No dysplasia: 1 case per 1000 patient-years (0.1 to 0.33% per year)
- Low grade dysplasia: 5 cases per 1000 patient-years (0.5% per year)
- High grade dysplasia: 42 cases per 1000 patient-years (7% per year)
- Other factors with increased risk
- Duration of symptoms >10 years
- Esophagitis on upper endoscopy
X. References
- Kahrilas in Feldman (2002) Sleisenger GI, p. 615-8
- Bryce (2022) Am Fam Physician 106(4): 383-7 [PubMed]
- Katzka (2003) Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 17(2):471 [PubMed]
- Sharma (2009) N Engl J Med 361(26): 2548-56 [PubMed]
- Smith (2005) Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14(11 pt 1): 2481-6 +PMID:16284367 [PubMed]
- Spechler (2002) N Engl J Med 346:836-42 [PubMed]
- Zimmerman (2014) Am Fam Physician 89(2): 92-8 [PubMed]