II. Indications
- Endemic area with classic lyme symptoms and signs
- Endemic area with non-specific symptoms >2 weeks
- No test needed if highly endemic area and classic signs
- Treat empirically if high pretest probablity
- Erythema Migrans in endemic area is diagnostic
- Titers are insensitive for Lyme Disease in <2 weeks
III. Precautions
- Information based on IDSA and CDC guidelines
- IDSA: Infectious Disease Society of America
- IDSA is considered standard of care recommendations
- Tertiary centers (e.g. Mayo) follow these guidelines
- Other guidelines (e.g. ILADS) are not reviewed here
- ILADS: International Lyme and Associated Diseases
- ILADS guidelines are considered controversial
- Avoid using labs that do not follow IDSA and CDC guidelines
- Avoid starting with Tier 2 confirmatory testing (EIA or Western Blot)
- High False Positive Rate
- Faint positive bands in uninfected person is common
IV. Mechanism
- Most testing for Borrelia Burgdorferi is to detect Antibody (EIA/ELISA, IF, Western Blot)
- Antigen tests (PCR) have specific indications (e.g. synovial PCR), but is otherwise not recommended
- Lyme Culture is rarely indicated
- Lyme IgM
- Present within 1-3 weeks after disease onset
- Peaks between 3 and 6 weeks
- Presence represents
- Early Lyme Disease
- Persists in prolonged Lyme Disease
- Reappears in Late Lyme Disease exacerbation
- Lyme Specific IgG
- Requires more than 3 weeks to develop
- Peaks months after disease onset
V. Labs: Modified Two Tiered Lyme Test Protocol (modified 2019)
- Tier 1: Initial Lyme Titer
- Obtain polyvalent enzyme immunoassay (EIA such as ELISA), or immunofluorescence assay (IF)
- Not needed if Erythema Migrans in endemic areas
- False Positive Rate is high
- Positive results are reflexed to confirmation testing
- Tier 2: Lyme confirmatory testing (if tier 1 test equivocal or positive)
- Option 1: Lyme Serology Second Generation Tests (approved by FDA, 2019, preferred)
- New pathway established for tests with better Test Sensitivity, Test Specificity and precision than the first test
- Since 2019, modified 2 tier confirmation is with another enzyme immunoassay (EIA), and recommended by CDC
- Option 2: Lyme Western Blot (conventional, older protocol, replaced by option 1)
- Western Blot for Lyme IgM and IgG has been historically used for confirmation before 2019
- Higher False Negatives than EIA testing in acute and early disseminated Lyme Disease
- False Negative in 60-75% of patients without disseminated disease (decreases to 10% in later stages)
- With Lyme Serology, Test Specificity: 99-100%
- IgG must be positive for symptoms >4 weeks
- Option 1: Lyme Serology Second Generation Tests (approved by FDA, 2019, preferred)
- References
VI. Labs: Available Tests
-
Borrelia Burgdorferi IgG and IgM
- Testing available by enzyme immunoassay (EIA such as ELISA), immunofluorescence assay, and Western Blot
- Persists for years following effective Antibiotic treatment
- Positive test after treatment does not indicate failed Antibiotics or chronic infection
- Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for Intrathecal Lyme Antibody production (by Antibody index assay)
- Indicated for neurologic symptoms
-
Synovial Fluid Lyme PCR
- Joint Aspiration in cases of suspected Lyme Arthritis
- Skin Biopsy of Erythema Migrans for Quantitative PCR
- Most sensitive test in early Erythema Migrans
- May be indicated in atypical rash presentations
- Sensitivity: 81%
- Nowakowski (2001) Clin Infect Dis 33:2023-7 [PubMed]
- Skin Culture of Erythema Migrans (uncommonly performed)
- Sensitivity: 60-80% for organisms
- Sample types
- Saline-lavage needle aspirate
- Punch Biopsy (2 mm) of leading edge
- C6 Peptide assay (IgG Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay)
- Under study as of 2012 for replacement of the two tiered protocol
- Lyme urine Antigen (not recommended)
- High False Positive Rate and not recommended
-
Borrelia Burgdorferi serum PCR
- Not recommended (some protocols use in atypical dermatitis)
VII. Efficacy
- Every available Lymes test is imperfect with False Positives and False Negatives (see causes below)
- Acute Lyme Disease diagnosis (esp. Erythema Migrans) should be clinical regardless of test results
- Modified Two Tiered Lyme Test Protocol
- Acute Erythema Migrans Rash present
- Test Sensitivity: 35 to 54% (compared with 25% via conventional Western Blot control group)
- Test Specificity: 99%
- References
- Acute Erythema Migrans Rash present
- Two Tiered Lyme Test Protocol (original/conventionaL, with Western Blot confirmation, pre-2019)
- Timing in relation to Erythema Migrans rash
- Acute Erythema Migrans rash: 25-40% seropositive
- Two to four weeks after Erythema Migrans: 60-70% seropositive
- Six weeks after Erythema Migrans: 90% seropositive
- Timing in relation to Lyme phase
- Stage 1: Early localized
- Acute phase: 17% seropositive
- Convalescent: 53% seropositive
- Stage 2: Early disseminated
- Multiple Erythema Migrans lesions: 43% seropositive
- Cardiac or neurologic findings: 100% seropositive
- Stage 3: Late
- Arthritis or neurologic findings: 100% seropositive
- Stage 1: Early localized
- References
- Timing in relation to Erythema Migrans rash
VIII. Causes: Lyme Serology False Positives
- Infectious Mononucleosis (esp. Lyme IgM)
- Rheumatologic Conditions (esp. Lyme IgM)
- Prior Lyme Vaccine (LYMErix)
- Test Western Blot and ignore OspA band
- Cross reactivity with Treponema infection
- Late stage Lyme Disease
- Serology (e.g. ELISA for IgG and IgM) Test Specificity falls with time
- Early-Stage: 93% (as high as 98% when pretest probability >50%)
- Late-Stage: 81%
IX. Causes: Lyme Serology False Negatives
- Testing within first 2 weeks of symptoms (acute and early disseminated Lyme Disease)
-
Antibiotics early in course of lyme infection
- Inadequate Antibiotic course can blunt seroconversion
X. Reference
- Steere in Mandell (2000) Infectious Disease, p. 2504-14
- (1995) MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 44:590 [PubMed]
- Klempner (2001) Am J Med 110:217-9 [PubMed]
- Samar (2024) Am Fam Physician 110(1):85-6 [PubMed]