II. Indications
- Risk stratification for the evaluation and management of presentations with risk of poor outcome
- Limit testing that would otherwise risk adverse effects (e.g. radiation exposure)
- Standardize the approach to common conditions (esp. for those with less experience)
- Checklist documentation to prevent errors
III. Precautions: Pitfalls
- Clinical Decision Rules may be misapplied
- Use decision rules that have been prospectively validated, refined and used in clinical practice
- Decision rules should have high Test Sensitivity
- However, this is at the expense of Test Specificity with a high rate of False Positive tests
- Use clinical gestalt when interpreting the results of Clinical Decision Rules
- Many decision rules have a subjective component (e.g. Wells Score "PE more likely than alternatives")
- Avoid applying the decision tool to patients outside the population studied
- Be aware of the study inclusion and exclusion criteria
- Avoid mashing multiple decision tools together
- Use each decision tool individually, in the way it was validated
- Be cautious when applying 2 decision rules, each directing a different approach
IV. Examples
- Head and Neck
- Thoracic
- See Chest Pain Decision Rules
- Bosner Chest Pain Decision Rule
- Diamond and Forrester Chest Pain Prediction Rule
- Vancouver Chest Pain Rule
- Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy Decision Rule
- Chest Wall Pain Prediction Rule
- CHF Decision Rule for Predicting Mortality
- Diehr Rule to Diagnose Pneumonia
- Nexus Chest CT Decision Rule in Blunt Trauma
- San Francisco Syncope Rule
- Abdomen
- Hematology and Oncology
- Neurologic
- Musculoskeletal
- Miscellaneous
V. References
- Mason, Grock, Carmelli in Herbert (2018) 18(6): EM:Rap 12-3