II. Category
III. Characteristics
- Semipermeable
- Allows gaseous and oxygen exchange across polyurethane membrane
- Retains exudate to create moist environment
- Adhesive
- Moisture retentive
IV. Indications
- Non-exudative wounds
- Autolytic Debridement
- Type 1 to 2 Pressure Sores
- Secure other Wound Dressings
- Protect vulnerable areas from friction injury
V. Contraindications
VI. Technique
- Change dressing every 3 to 7 days
- Check dressing daily (transparent)
- Consider protecting skin edge from maceration
- Stomal adhesive wafer
- Vaseline
- Zinc Oxide
VII. Advantages
- Requires less care than traditional dressing (gauze)
- Conformable
- Water resistant
- Wound visualized without dressing removal
- Protects against secondary infection
- No additional dressing needed (no tape or wrap)
VIII. Disadvantages
- Expensive
- Maceration of peri-wound edges (wound border must be intact)
- Too frequent dressing changes may strip skin
- No absorptive capacity (can only use in non-exudative wounds)
- Difficult to apply
- No data showing efficacy in Pressure Ulcers
- Contraindicated in infected wounds
- Separates from skin in high friction areas
IX. References
- Bello (2000) JAMA 283(6): 716-8 [PubMed]
- Degreef (1998) Dermatol Clin 16(2): 365-75 [PubMed]
- Findlay (1996) Am Fam Physician 54(5): 1519-28 [PubMed]
- Habif (1996) Clinical Derm, Mosby, p. 810-13
- Knapp (1999) Pediatr Clin North Am 46(6):1201-13 [PubMed]
- Krasner (1995) Prevention Management Pressure Ulcers
- Lewis (1996) Med-Surg Nursing, Mosby, p. 199-200
- Lueckenotte (1996) Gerontologic Nurs., Mosby, p. 800-7
- PUGP (1995) Am Fam Physician 51(5):1207-22 [PubMed]
- PUGP (1994) Pressure Ulcer Treatment, AHCPR 95-0653
- Way (1991) Current Surgical, Lange, p.95-108