http://www.fpnotebook.com/
Fetal Heart Tracing
Aka: Fetal Heart Tracing, Fetal Heart Tones, Fetal Heart Rate, FHR, FHT, Continuous Electronic Fetal Monitoring, CEFM, Structured Intermittent Auscultation, SIA, Reassuring Fetal Heart Tracing, Non-reassuring Fetal Heart Tracing, Ominous Fetal Heart Tracing
- See Also
- Fetal Assessment
- Fetal Testing Indications
- Monitoring Options
- Continuous Electronic Fetal Monitoring (CEFM)
- Indicated in high risk pregnancy (see efficacy below)
- See Peripartum Risk to the Fetus
- Structured Intermittent Auscultation (SIA)
- Contraindications
- High risk maternal or fetal risk factors
- See Peripartum Risk to the Fetus
- Requirements
- Requires one-to-one nursing (q15 minute monitoring)
- Nurses must be skilled in FHR auscultation
- Nurses must be able to palpate contractions
- Non-reassuring findings require clinical evaluation
- Monitoring frequency
- Stage 1:
- Low Risk: Every 15-30 minutes
- High risk: Every 15 minutes
- Stage 2:
- Low Risk: Every 5-15 minutes
- High Risk: Every 5 min or after each contraction
- Other indications as needed
- Before and after procedure (e.g. AROM, IUPC)
- Before and after ambulation
- Before and after medication including anesthesia
- Abnormal uterine contraction pattern
- After vaginal examination
- Procedure
- Baseline Fetal Heart Rate (FHR)
- Auscultate and count FHR for 60 seconds
- Perform between contractions
- Fetal response to labor
- Auscultate and count FHR for 60 seconds
- Perform immediately after contraction
- Variability assessment
- See FHR Variability
- Efficacy: Continuous Electronic Fetal Monitoring (CEFM)
- CEFM does not significantly improve fetal outcome
- Only measurable benefits
- Fewer Neonatal Seizures
- Good tracing is reassuring for good outcome
- No benefit in APGAR Scores
- No decrease in NICU admissions
- No change in perinatal death rate
- No reduction in Cerebral Palsy
- Non-reassuring tracing does not predict bad outcome
- False positive rate 99.8% if ominous tracing
- Late Decelerations
- Decreased variability
- CEFM increases the risk of surgical intervention
- Increases ceserean rate by 160%
- Increases operative Vaginal Delivery rate
- Consider informed consent for CEFM
- CEFM may be indicated in high risk pregnancies
- Consider intermittent monitoring if low risk
- References
- Luthy (1987) Obstet Gynecol 69(5):687-95
- Leveno (1986) N Engl J Med 315(10):615-19
- Interpretation
- Based on either method of auscultation (CEFM or SIA)
- CEFM: Graphical tracing of FHR and contractions
- SIA: Baseline and 60 sec before/after contractions
- Approach Mnemonic: DR C BRAVADO
- Determine Risk
- See Peripartum Risk to the Fetus
- Assign low, medium or high risk (see prenatal risk factors)
- Contractions
- Assess rate, rhythm, frequency, duration, intensity, and resting tone
- Baseline RAte
- Bradycardia (<110 bpm)
- Tachycardia (>160 bpm)
- Rising baseline
- Variability
- Absent or minimal variability suggests CNS Activity
- Accelerations
- Reassuring accelerations are >15 bpm above baseline for 15 seconds (if preterm >10 bpm for 10 seconds)
- Decelerations
- See Variable Decelerations
- See Late Decelerations
- Overall Assessment
- See Nonreassuring Fetal Status
- Signs: Reassuring
- Normal baseline (120-160)
- Moderate Fetal Bradycardia (100-120), good variability
- Good beat-to-beat variability (STV)
- Accelerations
- Heart Rate increases by 15-25 bpm over baseline
- Increase persists for 15-25 seconds
- Early Decelerations
- Suggests head compression with contraction
- Mild Variable Decelerations
- Signs: Non-Reassuring
- Fetal Tachycardia (>160)
- Moderate Fetal Bradycardia (100-120), lost variability
- Absent beat-to-beat variability (STV)
- Marked Fetal Bradycardia (90-100 bpm)
- Moderate Variable Decelerations
- Variable Decelerations
- Early Decelerations and slow return baseline
- Signs: Ominous
- Fetal Tachycardia with loss of variability
- Prolonged marked Fetal Bradycardia (<90 bpm)
- Late Decelerations
- Severe Variable Decelerations
- Fetal Heart Rate drops below 70 beats per minute
- Deceleration persists for 1 minute or more
- References
- Bailey (2000) ALSO, E:1-13
- Gabbe (2002) Obstetrics, p. 395
- (2009) Obstet Gynecol 114(1): 192-202
- Bailey (2009) Am Fam Physician 80(12): 1388-98
- Rylander (2001) Clin Fam Pract 3(2):287-305