http://www.fpnotebook.com/
Natural Family Planning
Aka: Natural Family Planning, Family Awareness Method, Symptothermal Method, Ovulation Method, Billings Method, Rhythm Method, Calendar Method
- Indications
- Pregnancy Prevention ("Contraception")
- Conception Planning
- Methods of Natural Family Planning
- Modern Methods
- Ovulation Method Criteria (Billings Method)
- Cervical Mucus characteristics
- Symptothermal Method Criteria
- Cervical Mucus characteristics
- Basal Body Temperature
- Older, outdated methods
- Rhythm Method (Calendar Method) - do not use
- Technique
- Review calendar history of 3-6 prior Menstrual Cycles
- Determine Ovulation time
- See Ovulation for specific findings
- Urine LH Kit (100% correlation)
- Cervical Mucus (48% correlation)
- Basal Body Temperature
- Avoid ineffective methods
- Salivary Ferning
- Salivary B-glucuronidase activity
- Avoid unprotected intercourse for mid-cycle 7-14 days
- Approximately Cycle Days 9 to 19 would be higher risk
- At higher risk mid-cycle days
- Abstain from intercourse
- Use barrier Contraception
- Efficacy
- Pregnancy prevention rate (Abstinence planning)
- Calendar (Rhythm Method): 83% effective (avoid)
- Basal Body Temperature alone: 96.1% effective
- Cervical Mucus alone: 92.6% effective
- Symptothermal Method: 99.6% effective
- Intended pregnancy rate (Conception planning)
- Normal fertility: 66% pregnancy rate within 1 cycle
- Disadvantages
- Regular Menstrual Cycles required
- Offers no Sexually Transmitted Disease protection
- Requires significant Patient Education
- Management
- Provide education on Emergency Contraception
- Review Menstrual Cycle and Ovulation
- Review Menstrual Cycle calendar over 3-6 months
- Review non-coital sexual activity
- Review barrier Contraception
- Resources
- California Family Health Council
- Address: 3600 Wilshire Blvd, #20, LA, CA 90010
- Phone: 626-931-1400
- The Couple to Couple League Foundation
- Address: P.O. Box 11184, Cincinnati, OH 45211
- Phone: 513-471-2000
- References
- Guida (1999) Fertil Steril 72:900-4
- Stanford (1998) J Fam Pract 46(1):65-71
- Ryder (1993) BMJ 307:723-6